Review of WebMD on ADHD Essay Example

Review of WebMD on ADHD Essay After evaluation WebMD website on ADD I have come to realize that the Information Is accurate, current, and provides a complete overview of the topic at hand. The definition of Accuracy Is defined as, the condition or quality of being true, correct, or exact; freedom from error or defect; preschools or exactness; correctness. (dictionary. Com) Accuracy Is Important when dealing with any type of information: but more so when dealing with medical information. WebMD provides us with link where we can contact the author of article and ask any questions retaining to the illness or disease. Another link that provides us with closure or authenticity is the who we are tab provided by the website. This is where you can find the credibility on the authors. On this link, it lists where they went to school, their board certification, and their previous/current employment. After evaluation WebMD, I have found that the information is accurate and trustworthy. I feel one of the most important things to consider when evaluating a weapon is how current the information is on the article. Website can lose their credibility if the information that they provided is out of date. We will write a custom essay sample on Review of WebMD on ADHD specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Review of WebMD on ADHD specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Review of WebMD on ADHD specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This makes it very crucial for websites to provide the newest information possible. Another issue that websites have is dead links. Dead links are web pages that have been updated or worked on and the link has been taken down. WebMD. Com was published in 2005; with the most recent update being in 2014. This weapon has also been able to make sure that there are no dead links on the website. When I compared WebMD information to the CDC website about ADD, I found similar to exact information. This is also a great way to mind out how accurate/current the information is on both of websites. Web coverage Is also very important. WebMD provides us with very detailed information that Is very easy to understand. The page also provides Images to help understand and support people with the illness or disease that they are describing. After reviewing the coverage of information on the website, I found that the website provided us with a complete overview of the disease. WebMD has proven that they have provided excellent coverage by providing us with accurate Information, correct clang, and fully operating links. Although some other websites require additional software to view their material, WebMD does not. This makes the Information very accessible. I feel that this weapon has provided us with a perfectly well rounded website that completely covers all aspects of evaluation In conclusion, many websites can provide people with false, inaccurate, or out dated information. It is very imperative when someone is searching for information regarding health issues on the Internet that information. It is important when dealing with a website that it is accuracy, current, ND has excellent coverage. Dont believe everything you read on the internet! People writing the information might not be qualified enough to write the information you are reading. The information that is most current is a great way to know that you are getting the most recent studies of the issue at hand. When evaluating the WebMD website on ADD and ADD I found that everything was accurate, all of the information was current, and the coverage on the information provided was very well organized and well written. The information provided also covered all of the basis of ADD/ADD.

Orwells Writing Rules Are Made to Be Broken

Orwells Writing Rules Are Made to Be Broken Orwell’s Writing Rules Are Made to Be Broken Orwell’s Writing Rules Are Made to Be Broken By Mark Nichol George Orwell, author of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm, has been celebrated far and wide (including on this site) for his essay â€Å"Politics and the English Language.† The moral force of his argument is undeniable: Orwell, a socialist, witnessed the, well, Orwellian, tyranny of the Soviet Union and feared the power of propaganda and the insidiousness of authoritarian obfuscation, hence his passion for clear, simple writing. Toward the end of this justifiably influential tract, Orwell exhorted readers to adhere to six commandments about writing. However, as he himself wrote in a subsequent paragraph, â€Å"I have not here been considering the literary use of language, but merely language as an instrument for expressing and not for concealing or preventing thought.† Beyond that caution, though, literal adherence to his dicta is inadvisable, and to some extent I disagree with each of them. 1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. Certainly, many figures of speech such as â€Å"bite the bullet,† â€Å"push the envelope,† and â€Å"go the extra mile† should be sent to the metaphor retirement home, and I’ve warned about buzzwords, but not every common figure of speech has worn out its welcome. They can be especially catchy when used in punny contexts: A government agency turns over a new leaf about deforestation, a rock band plays musical chairs with its lineup, a pharmaceutical company’s setback is a bitter pill to swallow. 2. Never us a long word where a short one will do. Utilization of sesquipedalian vocabulary unquestionably mitigates comprehension, but never is dishearteningly uncompromising. Better to advise minimizing multisyllabism. But must I always write do in place of accomplish? Spread instead of disseminate? Try in favor of endeavor? That’s an oddly totalitarian rule, coming from Orwell. 3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. Um, is always really necessary in that sentence? And â€Å"Omit a word† is more concise than â€Å"cut a word out.† But omit has more letters than cut. Do you see where this is going? The answer is, too far. Striving to attain Hemingwayesque conciseness is appropriate for assembly instructions, and journalistic writing should be as transparent as possible, but Bill Bryson never met an adjective or an adverb he didn’t like, and if anyone’s complained about that, I haven’t read the grievance. In moderation (or, in Bryson’s case, in excess), modification is merited. 4. Never use the passive where you can use the active. The case for active language is often strong. But passive constructions are acceptable when the actor in a sentence (in the following sentence’s case, the â€Å"seer†) is not significant: â€Å"Punk music can be seen as a reaction to the overblown theatricality of disco and arena rock.† And sometimes the object is more important than the subject. Yes, favor active voice, but don’t categorically prohibit occasional passive structure. 5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Am I prohibited from referring to an eminence grise, in favor of â€Å"power behind the throne† or â€Å"puppet master†? The French phrase for â€Å"gray eminence,† or â€Å"gray man,† is admittedly somewhat pretentious, but it’s also a rich metaphor and if you don’t know what it means, after you look it up, your word-hoard is in turn enriched. Likewise, scientific terminology and topic-specific jargon can become tiresome, but it’s often appropriate in moderation. 6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous. I disagree with this rule as well. Better, I say, to break any of these rules you like, but only after you acknowledge that each has its justifications and if you remain alert, in your writing, to abuses of the English language they caution against. But â€Å"Orwell, or else† is a policy that smacks of rigidity. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Writing Basics category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:What Is Irony? (With Examples)Ten Yiddish Expressions You Should KnowDouble Possessive